Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... Al Qaeda and What It Means to Be Modern (edition 2005)by John GrayA critique of ideas animating recent International Relations. Gray proffers a number of insights (well articulated, if not all wholly original) that ought to be repeated out loud every few months or so— Both the End of History thesis and the Clash of Civilizations thesis are bullshit. Check. Myths persist, even after they have been disproved. Yep. The rise of science was not inevitable. The advance of science and the growth of knowledge do not produce virtue and happiness. All protagonists in the current conflict are driven by beliefs that are opaque to them. The modern world only believes that it has left the past behind. There is no universally compelling way to be or to think. A very important book. The first thing I’ve read that systematically gets Al Qaeda right, as far as I can tell. That is, that Al Qaeda is essentially Western; another breakdown in Western society in response to Modernity, in the same way anarchism or nihilism or militias or other extreme movements were. It has the same vision of a revolutionary vanguard that will remake the world that Marxism, Fascism, and other radical modern political movements have had. It’s like a fusion of Fundamentalist Islam and Bakunin. Grey correctly locates the fundamental danger of the modern world in the urge on the part of any group to use technology to radically remake society. Also, he emphasizes Al Qaeda is another consequence of post-nation-state globalization(and probably the first of many similar movements), and must be addressed as such. It is an ideology and a movement, not a discrete group of people and not ultimately defeatable by attacking states or killing individuals. He paints a bleak picture of the coming decades, but I’m afraid a largely correct one. An interesting read, showing how Al Qaeda is a product of the modern world. It also goes into the history of "modern", and how the ideas behind the modern, Western, world evolved. That makes for a very interesting read, explaining the break between the medieval outlook in which the future was expected to be exactly the same as the past, and the modern view based on science and progress. I will need to re-read this book before I can say I've really understood its message. Fortunately, it is written in a pretty readable style, so that shouldn't be a problem. Now I've just got to find the time... |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)306.2Social sciences Social Sciences; Sociology and anthropology Culture and Institutions Political institutionsLC ClassificationRatingAverage:
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |