Revolution and Counter-revolutionOpen University Press, 1990 - 90 síður Revolution remains a key concept in the social sciences. After the 200th anniversary of the French Revolution, a debate still rages over its causes and meaning. At the same time as, in Eastern Europe, much of what the Russian Revolution was believed to have stood for is being rejected, the Chinese leadership has reaffirmed its right to maintain revolutionary political orthodoxy by force. In this book Professor Calvert aims to show how revolution must by its nature be disputed. When people observe revolutions, their interpretations of what they are seeing are conditioned by changing intellectual fashion and by wishful thinking and so too are the theories derived from them. This book re-examines the place of revolution in modern social theory and at the same time reasserts the need for systematic study in the social sciences. |
From inside the book
Niðurstöður 1 - 3 af 9
Síða 20
... historian has the advantage here in having access , many years after , to the reports of another trained group of ... historian - to use the skills of the historian in testing , evaluating and supplying the deficiencies of the ...
... historian has the advantage here in having access , many years after , to the reports of another trained group of ... historian - to use the skills of the historian in testing , evaluating and supplying the deficiencies of the ...
Síða 43
... historian Thiers had a remedy for it ; to withdraw the military forces to barracks and hold them in isolation while they were purged before being returned to the field . In 1989 the Chinese government has adopted precisely the same ...
... historian Thiers had a remedy for it ; to withdraw the military forces to barracks and hold them in isolation while they were purged before being returned to the field . In 1989 the Chinese government has adopted precisely the same ...
Síða 53
... historian . He concentrates on a few instances , the first three of which are traditional : Britain ( which he calls ' England ' - a common error , but one which does not inspire confidence ) , France and the United States . He then ...
... historian . He concentrates on a few instances , the first three of which are traditional : Britain ( which he calls ' England ' - a common error , but one which does not inspire confidence ) , France and the United States . He then ...
Aðrar útgáfur - View all
Common terms and phrases
achieve action American Revolution analysis Arendt argues armed forces assumption bourgeois bourgeoisie Calvert Cambridge century challenge Chinese Revolution Chorley communist comparative historical concept conflict consolidation context counter-revolution coup d'état definition develop economic elite Engels European example existing explanations of revolution fact fascism followed France freedom French Revolution fundamental German Revolution Gurr happened Hence historian ideas individual institutional insurrection internal Iran Iranian Revolution jacquerie Johnson Jon Elster leaders Lenin logic major social revolution Marx Marxist mass means military model of revolution modern Moore movement nature Neil Smelser organization overthrow Paris Commune peasantry peasants phenomenon political violence proletariat psychological rational reason rebellion reform regime revol revolutionary outcome revolutionary situation role Russian Revolution seek significance Skocpol social change social revolutions social sciences social scientists society sociological sociologist Soviet structure theory of revolution Tilly traditional transformation University Press ution view of revolution