For the Sake of Argument: Essays and Minority Reports'For the sake of argument, one must never let a euphemism or a false consolation pass uncontested. The truth seldom lies, but when it does lie it lies somewhere in between.'. The global turmoil of the last few years has severely tested every analyst and commentator. Few have written with such insight as Christopher Hitchens about the large events - or with such discernment and with about the small tell-tale signs of a disordered culture. For the Sake of Argument ranges from the political squalor of Washington, as a beleaguered Bush administration seeks desperately to stave off disaster and Clinton prepares for power, to the twilight of Stalinism in Prague; from the Jewish quarter of Damascus in the aftermath of the Gulf War to the embattled barrios of Central America and the imperishable resistance of Saralevo, as a difficult peace is negotiated with ruthless foes. Hitchens' unsparing account of Western realpolitik in the end shows it to rest on delusion as well as deception. The reader will find in these pages outstanding essays on political asassination in America as well as a scathing review of the evisceration of politics by pollsters and spin-doctors. Hitchens' knowledge of the tortuous history of revolutions in the twentieth century helps him to explain both the New York intelligentsia's flirtation with Trotskyism and the frailty of Communist power structures in Eastern Europe. Hitchens' pointed reassessments of Graham Greene, P.G. Wodehouse and C.L.R. James, or his riotous celebration of drinkiny and smoking, display an engaging enthusiasm and an acerbic wit. Equally entertaining is his unsparing rogues' gallery, which gives us unforgettable portraits of the lugubrious 'Dr'Kissinger, the comprehensively reactionary 'Mother' Teresa, the preposterous Paul Johnson and the predictable P.J. O'Rourke. |
From inside the book
Niðurstöður 1 - 3 af 56
Síða 46
But no pollster ever asked a sample group : ' If you were asked to choose between Ronald Reagan and the United States Constitution , which would you rather sacrifice ? ' Biased ? Meaningless ? More meaningless than the ABC News ...
But no pollster ever asked a sample group : ' If you were asked to choose between Ronald Reagan and the United States Constitution , which would you rather sacrifice ? ' Biased ? Meaningless ? More meaningless than the ABC News ...
Síða 48
Asked by a Times / CBS poll in March 1984 about Walter Mondale - whether their opinion was ' favourable ' - 47 per cent said that it was . Asked if they thought he had enough experience to be a good president ' , 75 per cent said yes .
Asked by a Times / CBS poll in March 1984 about Walter Mondale - whether their opinion was ' favourable ' - 47 per cent said that it was . Asked if they thought he had enough experience to be a good president ' , 75 per cent said yes .
Síða 50
As I read her the multiple choice of candidates and asked how she ' leaned ' , she said it was equal between Clinton and Tsongas . There was no real provision for that answer . ' All right , who do you think is the " frontrunner ?
As I read her the multiple choice of candidates and asked how she ' leaned ' , she said it was equal between Clinton and Tsongas . There was no real provision for that answer . ' All right , who do you think is the " frontrunner ?
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Efni
Introduction | 1 |
Where Were You Standing? | 7 |
Contempt for the Little Colony | 24 |
Höfundarréttur | |
15 aðrir hlutar ekki sýndir
Aðrar útgáfur - View all
For the Sake of Argument: Essays and Minority Reports Christopher Hitchens Engin sýnishorn í boði - 2014 |
Common terms and phrases
actually American appears asked authority become believe better British Bush called comes Communism course culture death democratic described effect election Europe face fact feel forces foreign former George German give given hand House idea intellectual interesting it's James Jewish Jews John keep kind Kissinger known Kurds Labour later least less lives London look Marxism matter means meeting mind moral never Nixon official once opinion Party perhaps person political poll President question Reagan reason remember Review seems Senate sense side social sort story Street talk tell term thing thought told took turn United Washington White writing written wrote York